tpo综合写作范文

tpo综合写作范文篇一

TPO综合写作范文21-25

TPO21

The lecturer points out three different shortcomings of genetically modified trees. In the aspects of adaptation, economic lucrativeness, and environmental value, they never have overwhelming advantage over natural trees. That means the points made in the reading are partial and biased.

First, genetic modification doesn’t necessarily make a natural tree more resistant to environmental adversities. Although genetic reconstructing may make a species stronger in a specific condition as the reading indicates, the new strain lakes the genetic diversity of a natural species. Thanks to the marginal differences between individuals, there can always be some survivors among natural species following a large

interruption like climate change or pest invasion. But similar changes may cause the distinction of a genetically modified species for their unification in characteristics.

Second, tree farmers don’t get guaranteed economic benefits if they plant genetically new strains. Companies that develop the new plants always charge farmers higher prices for

artificially improved seeds, and receive money from farmers each time they grow the same plant. Such company policies and

law will deprive farmers of the gaining mentioned in the reading.

Third, genetically modified trees don’t promise to protect wild trees. Actually, since they can grow faster with fewer resources, they are more ecologically invasive. Normally they outcompete natural trees by grasping natural resources like sunshine, water and soil. It’s far from the idealistic situation described in the reading.

TPO22

The lecturer refutes all the seemingly existing shortages of ethanol listed in the reading and holds that ethanol is quite likely a good replacement of gasoline as the future fuel. First, the application of ethanol will not create as much heat as that of gasoline does. Although the burning of ethanol will also generate carbon dioxide, it will not add to the severity of global warming. Since the production of ethanol requires the planting of corns, whose growth in turn requires carbon dioxide as nutrition, the raised amount of the unwanted gas will be offset therewith. This is the situation the reading doesn’t account for.

Second, the production of ethanol doesn’t surely reduce the food supply for farm animals. Because ethanol can be made out of any part of the plant whose cell walls contain cellulose, the cost of the pants’ useful parts can be avoided. This advantage renders the worry of the reading totally unnecessary. Finally, the price of ethanol will be largely reduced if the scale of manufacture increases. According to statistics, if the manufacture scale, following heavier demand of consumers, can be enlarged by three times, its cost will be reduced by forty percents. Under such circumstance, the government subsidies mentioned in the reading shall no longer be needed. TPO23

The lecturer holds that the main reason causing the overall decline in yellow cedar population is not yet decided. The proposed reasons in the reading, though responsible for the poor health of some individual plants, may not account for the decline of the whole species throughout the North American Continent.

First, healthy yellow cedar trees can secret a chemical that is poisonous to insects feeding on its barks. Hence, it is

unlikely that the cedar bark beetle can ever attack a plant before it gets ill or dead. The reading thus finds a misleading causal relationship between the insect and the tree.

Second, bears cannot be blamed for large-scaled dying of yellow cedars across North America, although they might be responsible for the accidental dying for some individual plants. Another condition that can set bears free from this accusation is that yellow cedars growing on bear-free islands are also dying in large numbers. Hereby the reading material fails to spot the primary reason again.

Third, cold climate can neither be blamed for the general failure of cedar population. The proof can be found in the trees’ wider recession in areas of lower elevation, where it’s warmer than on higher elevations. Though cold weather may have made cedars more sensitive, it cannot be the primary killer as the reading indicates.

TPO24

The lecturer extends possible explanations besides the conclusions made on the newly discovered T. Rex fossil and

suggests that the existing evidences can lead to something other than remaining animal tissues as suggested in the reading.

First, the branching channels in that leg bone can quite likely be the colonies of bacteria, since bacteria always take the hollows in a bone structure and develop themselves following the organic material. And the soft substance inside the

channels can also be the residues of these bacteria colonies, rather than once blood vessels suggested by the reading material.

Second, the reading assumes the reddish spheres found in the bone to be red blood cells, finding credence from their color and size. But fossils of primitive organisms in the same area also contain similar reddish spheres. With the knowledge that such primitive organisms could not yet have evolved red blood cells, there is a good reason to doubt that these spots are only reddish minerals instead of blood cells. The reading again makes an imprudent conclusion here.

Third, not a single sample of collagen found to this date is older than ten thousand years in age. The collagen found in the passage, however, is located in a seventy million-year-old

tpo综合写作范文篇二

托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全)

智课网TOEFL备考资料{tpo综合写作范文}.

托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全)

分享到：

摘要： 下面是小马过河整理的托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全)，其中包括托福tpo综合写作文本+音频汇总，欢迎同学们免费下载。

TPO综合写作范文是同学们备考 托福 写作的必需品，今天 小马 整理了托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全)，希望对大家备考 托福写作 考试有所帮助。

托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全) 托福TPO1综合写作范文 托福TPO2综合写作范文 托福TPO3综合写作范文 托福TPO4综合写作范文 托福TPO5综合写作范文 托福TPO6综合写作范文 托福TPO7综合写作范文 托福TPO8综合写作范文 托福TPO9综合写作范文 托福TPO10综合写作范文 托福TPO11综合写作范文 托福TPO12综合写作范文 托福TPO13综合写作范文 托福TPO14综合写作范文 托福TPO15综合写作范文 托福TPO16综合写作范文 托福TPO17综合写作范文 托福TPO18综合写作范文 托福TPO19综合写作范文 托福TPO20综合写作范文 托福TPO21综合写作范文 托福TPO22综合写作范文 托福TPO23综合写作范文 托福TPO24综合写作范文{tpo综合写作范文}.

上面介绍的就是托福TPO1-24综合写作范文(全)，希望同学们好好备考，祝愿大家都能取得托福高分，其他 托福备考 资料，请关注 小马过河 托福频道。

相关字搜索： 托福tpo综合写作文本

tpo综合写作范文篇三

新托福作文范文：TPO综合写作满分范文(一)

智课网TOEFL备考资料

新托福作文范文：TPO综合写作满分范文（一）

ETS推出的TPO系列是各位考生在备战新托福考试时非常重要的资料之一，下面是新托福名师推荐的TPO综合写作中的满分范文，希望能帮助许多刚刚接触新托福的朋友们了解和熟悉综合写作的方式和套路，拿到新托福综合写作的高分。

新托福考试TPO1综合写作高分范文：

The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have

negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.

According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.

The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people.

Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.{tpo综合写作范文}.

Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.

本文来源:

tpo综合写作范文篇四

TPO1-15综合写作满分范文

TPO1 综合写作高分考生范文

The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will bring side effects to both the companies and the society. This does not agree with the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy would be beneficial.

To begin with, according to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure their normal productivity. As a result, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time will have fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to the increase of profit for the enterprise.

The second point of difference is regarding impact on unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, the employers might raise their expectation on 4-day employees, rather than recruit more people. Consequently, the employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and therefore no additional jobs will be created.

Finally, the lecturer argues that not only the quality of life will decline if an employee works shorter hours and receives less pay, but also they have less chance to be promoted to a supervisory position. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied about life.

博主修订版：

The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.

According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.

The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people. Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced

to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.

Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.

Sample answer for TPO2 Integrated writing task （level 5）

The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened in reality.

First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn’t work hard but got recognition for the success nonetheless. This also indicates that people who worked hard were not given recognition they should have gotten. In other words, they weren’t given the opportunity to “shine”. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates.

Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are more responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in decision making. Groups needed more time for meetings, which are necessary procedures in decision making. This was another place where experience contradicted theory.

Third, influential people might emerge and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough

influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as{tpo综合写作范文}.

the leader, and might become less flexible in its thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.

TPO-3 integrated writing sample answer （满分范文）

The lecture revises the idea presented in the text, that Rembrandt was not the artist who painted the famous painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet”.

The inconsistency between the white cap, which identifies the woman as a servant, and the expensive fur collar she wears dissolves as the Professor explains that the fur collar was apparently painted over the original painting to increase its worth by displaying an aristocratic woman.

In addition, the assumption that light and shadow in the painting do not fit together is refuted by the fact that in the original painting, the woman wears a light cloth that illuminated her face. Thus the presentation of light and shadow was indeed very realistic and accurate, as it is characteristic of Rembrandt’s paintings.

Finally, the mystery of the panel consisting of patches glued together is also solved in the lecture. Actually, the wood panel was later enlarged to make it more grand and valuable, but the original painting was painted on a single panel, as Rembrandt would have done it. Furthermore, the wood is of the same tree used in other Rembrandt paintings, like the "Self-Portrait with a Hat”. All this information points to Rembrandt as the painter of the controversial painting.

下面这篇作文是针对TPO第四套的综合写作（关于恐龙是否是恒温动物）写的，虽然有一些小错误，但ETS评分为满分。

Sample Response

The professor actually contradicts the statements made in the passage. She is of the view that dinosaurs are not endotherms i.e. they were not able to keep their body temperature at a constant rate.

The professor contradicts the issue of dinosaurs being endothers based on the availability of fossils being available in thwe polar regions, she say that the polar regions in those days were not as cold as they are today i.e at least warm enough for dinosaurs to live. Durin harsh winters she says that there is a possibility of the dinosaurs actually migrating to warmer regions.

The issue of leg position and movement being used as a reason to clasify the dinosaurs as endotherms does not please the professor either. She says that dinosaurs had legs under their bodies to support their huge bodies i.e the legs under the body of the dinosaur were actually to support the huge weight of the dinosaur and not to provide it with a body structure like endotherms(which is actually suited for running).

The professor acknowledges the presence of haversian canals but also points out that that the fossils show the presence of growth rings. These rings occur due to the thickening of the bone. The thickening indicates that the dinosaurs were'nt actually growing continuously but were experiencing periods of rapid growth and periods of no growth in succesion. This pattern. she says is characteristic of non endothermic animals.

Thus it can be inferred that the professor challenges the passage by giving reasons as to why she thinks that the dinosaur is not an endotherm.

Description of Response:

Despite initial appearances, this response largely succeeds in clearly and accurately presenting how the lecture points take issue with the points in the reading passage that dinosaurs were endotherms. The first point regarding dinosaurs in polar regions could be a bit clearer. Otherwise, the response mainly suffers from typographical errors, but these are not regarded as major problems; it is obvious that the writer has good control of structure and vocabulary and the ability to use these to convey in an organized and logical manner what has been understood and asked.

Sample answer for TPO5 Integrated writing task

The author of the reading passage proposes three theories as likely explanations of the primary function of chaco conyon houses, giant structures built in the 12th century. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies in each of these theories.

The lecturer argues that the modest number of fireplace in there structures is in contradiction with the huge size of these houses, indicating that these structures could not have been used for residential purposes. The reading, however, draws comparisons between the chaco houses and other similar large residential structures in support of the "residential" theory.

The second theory,that the houses were used for food storage, is also rejected by the lecturer. He explains that a place that had been used for storing maize would have many traces of scattered maize, which is not the case in the area of the chaco canyon houses. This proves that the "food storage theory" is unlikely.

Finally, regarding the third theory, the "ceremony theory", the lecturer contends that the presence of broken pots close to the great houses does not offer sufficient proof that this was a place for ceremonial activities. He argues that there are other materials such as pieces of construction trash found along with the broken pots, which suggest that these pots were probably not used for ceremonial purposes but instead were discarded by construction workers upon completion of the great houses.{tpo综合写作范文}.

本篇范文可以借鉴的模板

The author of the reading passage proposes three theories as likely explanations of__________. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies in each of these theories.

The lecturer argues that_________________. The reading, however, ____________ in support of the__________ theory.

The second theory, that ________________, is also rejected by the lecturer. He explains that ___________________. This proves that the “________ theory” is unlikely. Finally, regarding the third theory, the “_______ theory”, the lecturer contends that__________. He argues that___________________.

tpo综合写作范文篇五

托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文【高分必备】

智课网TOEFL备考资料

托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文【高分必备】

摘要： 托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文下载啦！这份资料有多给力，马叔就不赘述了！总之托考的孩子都是人手必备的！你不想拥有一份吗？

托福 TPO综合写作满分作文范文 Topic 5 Reading

Donating part of one’s income to public causes, known as charitable giving, used to be a common practice. But, in the United States charitable giving has declined substantially in recent years, and, for several reasons, it is unlikely to increase in the future.

One reason that charitable giving has fallen is simply that there is less need for charitable giving, because the United States government now provides most of the important public services. The government assumes 承担 much of the responsibility for feeding the poor, providing health care, and taking care of the victims of natural disasters—functions that charities used to perform. These government institutions of social welfare are permanent, and so the diminished need for private charitable giving will also be permanent.

Another reason people are, and will be, giving less to charities is that in the past few years there have been highly publicized disclosures that the managers of some prominent national charities were receiving huge salaries and other benefits as large or larger than salaries of heads of major for-profit corporations. These salaries and expenses for travel, fancy offices, and advertising significantly reduce the percentage of donated money that went to charitable purposes. Naturally people have been turned off 厌烦by these excesses and inefficiencies.

Finally, beyond the shortcomings of legitimate charities, there has been an increasing number of fraudulent solicitations恳求，劝诱 by organizations or individuals who merely pose as charities. As a result, people are now becoming skeptical even about what are in fact legitimate appeals for support. So potential donors are starting to give less and give less frequently. And since the incidence of charity fraud seems to be increasing, we can expect further declines N. in charitable giving as people become more concerned that they are being taken advantage of.

托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文 Topic 5 Listening

There’s no doubt that giving to charities has declined in recent years, but there are good reasons to think it’ll soon begin to go up.

Consider, for example, the fact that the number of elderly and retired people in our society keeps growing. Right now, elderly citizens who can’t afford health care often rely on government programs to pay for it. But as the elderly

population grows, government programs probably won’t be able to cover the health assistance, Americans respond to that need. And since the need will be increasing, we should expect to see charitable giving rise accordingly.

There’s another reason to be optimistic about the future of charitable giving. The disclosures of waste and bad

management at major charities, and people’s anger at this waste, are producing significant reforms. Overpaid managers have been forced to resign by the bad publicity. Charities are reducing their expenses and are now subject to服从 closer public scrutiny. As a result, people are regaining confidence that the money they donate will support the causes they care about.

People’s reaction to charity fraud is also evolving正在发展. In the short run, people don’t want to donate because they’re concerned with whether charities are honest. But in the long run, such skepticism makes people careful, not stingy. For example, many people now refuse to give money when they’re asked to do so over the telephone. They insist on receiving proof and documentation before they donate.

Just as people learn how to be careful consumers, most people are acquiring the skills needed to guard against charity fraud without stopping their support for worthwhile causes.

托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文： Topic 6 Reading

It used to be that parents took their children on vacation during the summer, when school was out of session. But today, much more often than in the past, many parents take their children on vacation during the school year. Although these children are away from school, sometimes for several weeks, traveling itself serves a valuable educational function.

The most important educational benefit of taking children on vacation is that traveling exposes children to new places and cultures. It is good for children to read about distant countries, but it is even better to take them there.

What students learn by meeting the people and absorbing the culture of these places is something they could not learn in their classrooms.

Moreover, the benefits to the children who have been away from the classroom for several weeks traveling continue after they have returned to their classes. Students who are in school every day of the school year can easily lose enthusiasm for their studies. But students invigorated by time away return with heightened excitement.

The trend of students taking vacations during the school year also has benefits for teachers. When these students return to school, their knowledge and enthusiasm contribute positively to the entire class.

Teachers can ask the children to share stories of their travels with their peers and can incorporate what they have learned from traveling into writing and reading projects. This makes lesson development easier for teachers because the returning students’ experiences provide a ready basis for classroom discussions and projects.

托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文 Topic 6 Listening

Now, let’s consider how taking children on vacation when school is in session impacts their education. I believe the impact on children and their teachers can be quite negative.

While students have been traveling, their fellow students have been working. What do you think happens when they return to school? Well, they have to spend a lot of time “playing catch-up,” you know, doing work that fellow students have already done. It’s one thing to miss a day or two of school, but many parents take their children on vacation for weeks on end, and it’s very difficult for any child to make up that much missed time. So, the missed learning has to be weighed against the benefits of traveling and learning about other cultures. On balance, what is lost is greater than what is gained.

When children come back to class after a long trip, they’re excited about their recent adventures. Sounds good, but this enthusiasm can have a downside. Their excitement can make it difficult for them to fit back into the routine of the school day. School seems a little boring to them, so they’re not attentive to their studies, and their restlessness can

distract other students.

When a student is distracted or has to catch up on missed work, there’s a negative effect on the teacher too.

Teachers have lesson plans that detail, day by day, what they are going to teach. When a student is absent from the classroom, this interferes with a teacher’s plan for that student. And if teachers spend time helping a few students catch up, they have less time for other students… so they suffer too.

以上就是本文为你介绍的托福TPO综合写作满分作文范文，托福综合写作考查学生的听力、阅读、写作三方面的技能，需要考生具有很强的综合能力，提前做好托福综合写作范文是非常有必要的，希望以上的这些内容能够让你有所领悟。

tpo综合写作范文篇六

托福TPO 30 综合写作Task 1 范文

Reading

A little over 2200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror’, a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun’s rays onto Roman ships, causing them to catch fire. However, we have several reasons to suspect that the story of the burning mirror is just a myth and the Greeks of Syracuse never really built such a device.

First, the ancient Greeks were not technologically advanced enough to make such a device. A mirror that would focus sunlight with sufficient intensity to set ships on fire would have to be several meters wide. Moreover, the mirror would have to have a very precise parabolic curvature

(a curvature derived from a geometric shape known as the parabola). The technology for manufacturing a large sheet of copper with such specifications did not exist in the ancient world.

Second, the burning mirror would have taken a long time to set the ships on fire. In an experiment conducted to determine whether a burning mirror was feasible, a device concentrating the Sun’s rays on a wooden object 30 meters away took ten minutes to set the object on fire; and during that time, the object had to be unmoving. It is unlikely that the Roman ships stayed perfectly still for that much time. Such a weapon would therefore have been very impractical and ineffective.

Third, a burning mirror does not seem like an improvement on a weapon that the Greeks already had: flaming arrows. Shooting at an enemy’s ships with flaming arrows was a common way of setting the ships on fire. The burning mirror and flaming arrows would have been effective at about the same distance. So the Greeks had no reason to build a weapon like a burning mirror.

The professor believes that the claim made in the reading passage that the story of a burning mirror is just a myth and Greeks never really built the device is unconvincing.

To begin with, according to the speaker, it is not true that ancient Greeks were faced with technological problems in making a large sheet of burning mirrors. This is because, rather than a single large sheet of copper, the Greeks could instead manufacture many small pieces of copper and combine all the pieces in a parabolic shape so that the desired outcomes were to be achieved.

Secondly, the reading passage states that the device would have taken such a long time to set the ships on fire that it wouldn't have been practical and effective. However, the professor points out that the ancient Greeks didn't have to set the wood of the ships on fire; instead, there was a particular object, the pitch, on the ships of the enemies and could easily catch on fire in seconds. Therefore, Greeks could full make use of the burning mirror to set the pitch on fire and wait for the quick spread of the fire all over the ships.

Thirdly, quite contradictory to the argument by the author of the reading passage, the counterargument in the listening holds that using a burning mirror would be rather invisible to the Roman soldiers in comparison with using the flaming arrows. Besides, fire set by the burning mirrors would be such a surprise to the enemies that no preparation was available to put out the fire.